Mana manasuloni maatalu… ee mail loo..
Disclaimer: ......This mail is meant for GUYS ONLY. as only guys can connect to the content in the mail. ammayilu chadivina, tittina, tittukunna, reply ichina naakemi sambandham ledu....
college lo unnannallu chaduvulu yeppudu aipothay, exams nunchi vimukti yeppudu vastundi, job lo dabbulu yeppudu sampadistam ani tondara padatham. job search lo nana tippalu padi kanapadina prati company interview attend ayyi, nana ______ ______ job sampadistham.
job join.
first 1 month - no work.only enjoy - all happies second month - work + enjoy - okthird month - only work. no enjoy - problem starts
appatiki office politics telusthay.
pakka team lo manager manchodu aiuntadu.
pakka team lo ammayilu bavuntaru.
pakka team lo hikes baaga istharu.
pakka team lo work asale undadu. manaki matram roju festival.
chesina paniki cheyyani paniki dobbinchukovatame.
okko clientemo pichi na requirements isthadu. avi pani cheyyavu ani telisi alane cheyyali.
ardha ratri supportlu. onsite vadini amma na bootulu tittu paripodam anipsithundi.
kani office lo net connection free and coffee free ane okka alochana aapestundi.
manaki oka batch tayaravutundi.varaniko . . rendu varalako mandu kotti TL, PM ni titti oka aaru nelalu gadipestham. ila loop lo petti kodithe rendu yellu aipothay. appatiki kalla chuttu black circles, vellu vankarlu, meda noppulu . . . picha na jabbulu anni vachesi untay. sontha amma,nanna,akka, chelli,anna, tammudu ne chuttam choopu ga choodataniki velthuntam. oka vela bro/sis unte, valle s/w field lo unte ardham cheskuni tittatam maanestharu. ala lekapothe phone chesina prati sari sanjaishi.
salary padutu untundi. bonds ki ani, mutual funds ki ani, credit card bills ki ani katti katti sampadinchindi antha dhara postham. inkemanna migilithe telivainodu aithe home loan meeda, manalantodu aithe mandu, cigarette, gaali tirugudu meeda tagalesestam.ila jeevitam prasantham ga saguthu undaga one fine day yedoka oka ex-colleague / colleague pelli settle aindi ani pilusthadu.
manaki oka ammay unte bavundu ane oka verri alochana pudutundi. mana s/w field lo bavunna ammalayu antha booked, married or north indians ayi untaru. akkade vanda lo 95 mandi filter aipotharu. migatha aidu lo 4 mandi ni "friend" kante akka ani pilavatam better anetattu untaru. aa migilina okka ammay kosam team antha oora kukkalla kotteskuntu untam. aa ammay yevaritho nu commit avvakundane andaritho free ga bathikesthu untundi. one more fine day pelli card istundi. inkemundi. coming weekend oka sitting. aa ammay manchidi kaadu ani deciding. next day nunchi inkokallaki trying.
reviews vasthay. "Nuvvu excellent, nuvve lenide company ledu, katti kamal, etc, etc . . . " ani cheppi oorinchi chivarlo "but" antaru. teera choosthe nee salary lo inko senakkay pencham, po antaru. resume update cheyyali ani gatha aaru nelalu ga teeskuntunna decision ni malla oka sari smarinchukuni ala ichina senakkayala meeda batikestuntam.
jeevitam ante Dooradarshan lo Hyderabad prasaram la ne untunda vere programs yemi undava!!! Cheee manaaaa bathuku !
Thanks & Regards,
Hazarath.
Thursday, July 12, 2007
Taj Mahal---Hidden Truth
BBC says about Taj Mahal---Hidden Truth -
No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says theTaj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ) . In the course of his research O ak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court chronicle, Badshahnama,Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial . The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur stillretains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building.
Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place fordead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers. For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term " Mahal " has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria. "The unusual explanation that the term TajMahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects. Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani ," he writes. Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace .. Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created bycourt sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists . Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story.
Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a fewsamples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built.
The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time. Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu templeratherthan a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public . Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples . Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi's government tried to have Prof. Oak's book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the first edition dire consequences . There is only one way to discredit or validate Oak's research.
The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal under U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate.
Do circulate this to all you know and let them know about this reality.....
No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says theTaj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ) . In the course of his research O ak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court chronicle, Badshahnama,Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial . The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur stillretains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building.
Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place fordead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers. For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term " Mahal " has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria. "The unusual explanation that the term TajMahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects. Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani ," he writes. Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace .. Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created bycourt sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists . Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story.
Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a fewsamples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built.
The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time. Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu templeratherthan a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public . Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples . Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi's government tried to have Prof. Oak's book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the first edition dire consequences . There is only one way to discredit or validate Oak's research.
The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal under U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate.
Do circulate this to all you know and let them know about this reality.....
My first Blog
Hai Frends,
Hearty Welcome from Hazarath.
You can find AMAZING news from this blog now onwards..
Have a nice day.
Hearty Welcome from Hazarath.
You can find AMAZING news from this blog now onwards..
Have a nice day.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
